299 | 0 | 82 |
下载次数 | 被引频次 | 阅读次数 |
促进健康公平是实现共同富裕的内在要求。数字普惠金融在促进社会公平、实现共同富裕方面发挥着不可替代的作用。本文采用2014—2020年北京大学数字普惠金融指数和中国家庭追踪调查数据,从相对流动和绝对流动两个视角,实证检验了数字普惠金融对健康代际流动的影响及作用机制。研究发现,数字普惠金融不仅显著降低了子代与父代之间的健康相关性,还推动了子代健康在代际间的向上流动。异质性分析发现,数字普惠金融对提高中低健康水平家庭、女性子代家庭以及农村家庭的相对健康代际流动更加显著。机制分析发现,数字普惠金融主要通过提高收入代际流动、提高教育代际流动和提高健康服务可及性促进健康代际流动。基于研究结论,本文提出强化数字基础设施建设,强化政策扶持与监管,全面提高居民金融素养、数字素养和健康素养的政策建议。本文的研究为发挥数字普惠金融促进健康代际流动的作用提供了理论依据。
Abstract:The positive role of digital financial inclusion in narrowing socioeconomic gaps and facilitating intergenerational income mobility has been widely recognized and validated. However, research on the impact of digital financial inclusion on health and intergenerational health mobility remains limited. In terms of research on intergenerational health mobility, existing studies mainly focus on the socioeconomic factors and behavioral mechanisms underlying intergenerational health transmission, while from the perspective of digital financial inclusion, there are few studies on the influence of such external policy or environmental dimensions, which is not conducive to understanding the role of the overall social institutional environment and technological progress in the intergenerational mobility.Using the data from four rounds of the China Family Panel Studies from 2014 to 2020, this paper empirically examines the impact of digital financial inclusion on intergenerational health mobility and its mechanism from the perspective of relative and absolute mobility. The study reveals that digital financial inclusion not only significantly reduces the health correlation between children and parents but also promotes upward improvement in children's health across generations. Digital financial inclusion exhibits a significant characteristic of assisting the disadvantaged, particularly in enhancing the relative intergenerational health mobility of families with medium to low health levels, families with female children, and rural families. Mechanism analysis shows that digital financial inclusion promotes intergenerational health mobility mainly by promoting intergenerational mobility of socioeconomic status and ensuring access to health services.Compared with previous studies, this paper makes the following marginal contributions. First, in the context of common prosperity, it examines intergenerational health mobility from the perspective of digital financial inclusion, enriching the research perspective of intergenerational health mobility. Second, based on the relatively objective physiological health and mental health variables, it measures the individual health utility value and life expectancy and obtains the comprehensive health index QALY value. This value comprehensively considers the individual's quality of life and length of life, makes up for the limitation of using a single index to measure health, and can fully reflect the health level of children and parents. Third, this paper offers a comprehensive description of intergenerational health mobility from relative and absolute mobility, which can not only show the degree of health transmission between generations but also reflect the improvement of the health of children. Fourth, this study comprehensively examines the impact mechanism of digital financial inclusion on intergenerational health mobility from three aspects: improving intergenerational income mobility, intergenerational education mobility, and access to health services.
[1]张勋,万广华,张佳佳,等.数字经济、普惠金融与包容性增长[J].经济研究,2019,54(8):71-86.
[2]吕光明,周元任,刘文慧.数字普惠金融促进共同富裕的微观证据——基于社区层面分项收入视角的研究[J].武汉大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2023,76(3):122-135.
[3]吴本健,邓蕾,袁伟伦,等.数字技术可得性对农村贫困地区主观相对贫困的影响[J].农村金融研究,2021(6):59-68.
[4] CURRIE J,MORETTI E. Mother’s education and the intergenerational transmission of human capital:evidence from college openings[J]. Quarterly journal of economics,2003,118(4):1495-1532.
[5]李长安,杨智姣,薛畅.健康代际流动与机制分析[J].中国人口科学,2021(6):68-80+127-128.
[6] JONSSON F, SEBASTIAN M S, HAMMARSTR?A, et al.Intragenerational social mobility and functional somatic symptoms in a northern Swedish context:analyses of diagonal reference models[J]. International journal for equity in health,2017,16(1):1-10.
[7] MARMOT M. Social determinants of health inequalities[J]. Lancet,2005,365(9464):1099-1104.
[8]邱士娟,陈卫民.向上社会流动预期提高自评健康吗?——基于CGSS的实证分析[J].劳动经济研究,2023,11(1):103-121.
[9] SOROKIN P. Social mobility[M]. New York:Harper&Brothers,1927:133.
[10] GIDDENS A. The constitution of society:outline of the theory of structuration[M]. Berkeley:University of California Press,1986:1-402.
[11]阳义南,连玉君.中国社会代际流动性的动态解析——CGSS与CLDS混合横截面数据的经验证据[J].管理世界,2015(4):79-91.
[12]梁榜.普惠金融如何影响收入分配——兼论贫困减缓的中介效应[J].财贸研究,2022,33(8):17-31.
[13]叶琴,袁歌骋,张呈磊.数字普惠金融与收入机会不平等[J].当代经济科学,2023,45(3):114-126.
[14] LINK B G,PHELAN J. Social conditions as fundamental causes of disease[J]. Journal of health and social behavior,1995,51(S):80-94.
[15]余志刚,孙子烨,崔钊达.收入及其不确定性对城乡居民膳食健康的影响研究[J].农业经济与管理,2023(2):35-47.
[16]张顺,李诗扬.教育代际流动与中老年父代心理健康差异[J].西安交通大学学报(社会科学版),2022,42(6):121-132.
[17]王义中,林溪,李振华,等.数字普惠金融助力共同富裕:基于流动性约束视角[J].经济研究,2024,59(6):49-68.
[18] RUTSTEIN S O. Factors associated with trends in infant and child mortality in developing countries during the 1990s[J]. Bulletin of the world health organization,2000,78(10):1256-1270.
[19]仇雨临,冉晓醒.健康服务可及性对老年人健康的影响——基于CLHLS数据的分析[J].中国卫生政策研究,2019,12(7):1-10.
[20]迟欣欣,刘喜华,李聪.精准扶贫助力农民跨越“健康贫困”陷阱:理论分析与实证检验[J].人口与发展,2024,30(4):76-88.
[21]马述忠,张道涵,潘钢健.数字金融与老年人健康:基于优质医疗服务可及机制视角[J].求是学刊,2022,49(5):56-70.
[22]赵忠,侯振刚.我国城镇居民的健康需求与Grossman模型——来自截面数据的证据[J].经济研究,2005,40(10):79-90.
[23] HALLIDAY T, MAZUMDER B, WONG A. Intergenerational mobility in self-reported health status in the US[J].Health economics,2020,29(3):367-381.
[24]朱铭来,何敏.中国家庭代际健康流动——指标测度、经验证据与机理阐释[J].南开经济研究,2023(9):159-178.
[25] LIU G G,WU H Y,LI M H,et al. Chinese time trade-off values for EQ-5D health states[J]. Value in health,2014,17(5):597-604.
[26]高向阳,康晓平.基于多状态生命表对中国高龄老人健康期望寿命分析[J].中国卫生统计,2010,27(5):455-458.
[27]彭澎,周力.中国农村数字金融发展对农户的收入流动性影响研究[J].数量经济技术经济研究,2022,39(6):23-41.
(1)针对问卷中“你认为自己身体健康状况如何”下设的五个答案,本文定义“非常健康”“很健康”为健康状态、“比较健康”“一般”“不健康”为不健康状态。
(2)六种状态转移:“健康—健康”“健康—不健康”“健康—死亡”“不健康—健康”“不健康—不健康”和“不健康—死亡”。
(3)本文对问卷中问题“互联网使用程度”的五个答案:“非常不重要”“不重要”“一般”“重要”“非常重要”,分别赋值1到5。
基本信息:
DOI:10.19653/j.cnki.dbcjdxxb.2025.02.005
中图分类号:F49;F832
引用信息:
[1]张颖熙,谭诗异.共同富裕下数字普惠金融如何促进健康代际流动[J].东北财经大学学报,2025,No.158(02):56-71.DOI:10.19653/j.cnki.dbcjdxxb.2025.02.005.
基金信息:
国家社会科学基金一般项目“中国家庭健康代际流动的作用机制与政策干预研究”(23BJL041); 中国社会科学院学科建设“登峰战略”资助计划(DF2023ZD21); 湖南省哲学社会科学规划基金“学术湖南”精品培育项目“绿色消费的激励机制及政策研究”(24ZDAJ005)