| 73 | 0 | 37 |
| 下载次数 | 被引频次 | 阅读次数 |
中国各级地方政府在地区经济发展中扮演着重要角色,其作为监管者和协调者对企业等经济主体的发展影响深远。本文基于2001—2019年中国沪深A股上市公司的数据,通过企业注册地址来匹配政府驻地迁移的地理信息,利用三重差分模型实证检验了政府地理邻近对企业年报可读性的影响及作用机制。研究发现:政府地理邻近能够提高企业年报可读性;政府地理邻近通过强化政府监管效应、强化企业对政府的政策响应提高企业年报可读性;政府地理邻近对企业年报可读性的提高作用发生在国有企业、近距离企业、与所在地市级政府驻地地理距离变近的企业、东部地区企业中。本文研究为中国政商关系分析提供了一个新的视角,并对中国“亲清有为”的政商关系优化具有实践意义。
Abstract:Local governments at all levels in China play a vital role in regional economic development, with their functions as regulators and coordinators exerting profound influence on enterprises and other economic entities. Government seat relocation, as a significant spatial policy practice, provides a rare research setting for examining how changes in the geographic distance between the government and firms affect corporate information disclosure behavior. From the perspective of government geographic proximity, this study aims to reveal its causal effect on the readability of listed firms' annual reports and its underlying mechanisms. The findings offer empirical evidence for building a “cordial, clean, and impactful” government-business relationship and provide insights for optimizing spatial governance and improving the quality of information disclosure in capital markets.Using the quasi-natural experiment of prefecture-level city government seat relocations in China from 2001 to 2019, this study manually collected relocation information, including cities, timing, and addresses, and combined it with listed firms' registration addresses. The study empirically examines the impact of government geographic proximity on the readability of corporate annual reports and its underlying mechanisms. The findings are as follows. First, government geographic proximity significantly improves annual report readability. Second, mechanism tests indicate this effect operates mainly through two channels: strengthening government supervision and enhancing firms' policy responsiveness. Proximity reduces regulatory costs and information asymmetry while encouraging firms to respond more actively to information disclosure policies. Third, heterogeneity analysis shows the effect is more pronounced among state-owned enterprises, diminishes with distance, is stronger for municipal(vs. provincial) relocations, and is concentrated in eastern China.The marginal contribution of this study has two aspects. First, it constructs a “city, year, and distance” triple difference framework and employs advanced text analysis to measure readability, offering a referential identification strategy and measurement approach for related research. Second, from a geographic proximity perspective, it leverages exogenous government seat relocation policies to identify the causal effect of government-business spatial distance on information disclosure quality, providing new geospatial evidence for empirical research on the “cordial, clean, and impactful” government-business relationship in China's context.This study provides new evidence from a geospatial perspective for understanding China's “cordial, clean, and impactful” government-business relationship and extends interdisciplinary research on political geography and corporate governance. It supports local governments in optimizing spatial layouts to reduce regulatory costs and enhance oversight efficiency, strengthens the exemplary role of state-owned enterprises in information disclosure, and improves policy communication and compliance guidance for small and medium-sized enterprises through geographic proximity.
[1]BLOOMFIELD R. The“incomplete revelation hypothesis” and financial reporting[J]. American accounting association,2002,16(3):233-243.
[2]LI F. Annual report readability, current earnings, and earnings persistence[J]. Journal of accounting and economics,2008,45(2-3):221-247.
[3]叶勇,王涵.盈余管理对企业年度报告可读性的影响研究[J].四川理工学院学报(社会科学版),2018,33(6):52-63.
[4]王海,尹俊雅.政府驻地迁移的资源配置效应[J].管理世界,2018,34(6):60-71.
[5]JOHN K, KNYAZEVA A, KNYAZEVA D. Does geography matter?Firm location and corporate payout policy[J].Journal of financial economics,2011,101(3):533-551.
[6]周泽将,刘中燕.独立董事本地任职对上市公司违规行为之影响研究——基于政治关联与产权性质视角的经验证据[J].中国软科学,2017(7):116-125.
[7]宛晴,程小可,杨鸣京,等.大客户地理邻近性能够抑制公司违规吗?[J].中国软科学,2019(8):100-119.
[8]于瑶,祁怀锦.集团公司董事会建设与央企全要素生产率——一项准自然实验[J].经济管理,2021,43(10):24-41.
[9]宋玉,沈吉,范敏虹.上市公司的地理特征影响机构投资者的持股决策吗?——来自中国证券市场的经验证据[J].会计研究,2012(7):72-79+97.
[10]黄福广,彭涛,邵艳.地理距离如何影响风险资本对新企业的投资[J].南开管理评论,2014,17(6):83-95.
[11]董静,汪立,吴友.地理距离与风险投资策略选择——兼论市场环境与机构特质的调节作用[J].南开管理评论,2017,20(2):4-16.
[12]刘文军.审计师的地理位置是否影响审计质量?[J].审计研究,2014(1):79-87.
[13]王菊仙,王玉涛,鲁桂华.地理距离影响证券分析师预测行为吗?[J].中央财经大学学报,2016(1):61-72.
[14]KIM O, VERRECCHIA R E. The relation among disclosure, returns, and trading volume information[J]. The accounting review,2001,76(4):633-654.
[15]马晨,程茂勇,张俊瑞,等.地理邻近对上市公司会计错报的影响——基于媒介环境调节效应的分析[J].投资研究,2015,34(9):46-60.
[16]张敏,刘耀淞,王欣,等.企业与税务局为邻:便利避税还是便利征税?[J].管理世界,2018,34(5):150-164.
[17]孙文章.信息发布者会计背景有助于提高信息可读性吗?——基于董秘个人特征的证据[J].经济管理,2021,43(9):154-171.
[18]MILLER B P. The effects of reporting complexity on small and large investor trading[J]. The accounting review,2010,85(6):2107-2143.
[19]GUAY W, SAMUELS D, TAYLOR D. Guiding through the fog:financial statement complexity and voluntary disclosure[J]. Journal of accounting and economics,2016,62(2-3):234-269.
[20]LOUGHRAN T, MCDONALD B. Measuring readability in financial disclosures[J]. The journal of finance,2014,69(4):1643-1671.
[21]王克敏,王华杰,李栋栋,等.年报文本信息复杂性与管理者自利——来自中国上市公司的证据[J].管理世界,2018,34(12):120-132+194.
[22]HUANG Z, LI L, MA G, et al. Hayek, local information, and commanding heights:decentralizing state-owned enterprises in China[J]. The American economic review,2017,107(8):2455-2478.
[23]罗进辉,黄泽悦,朱军.独立董事地理距离对公司代理成本的影响[J].中国工业经济,2017(8):100-119.
[24]李欣融,孟猛猛,雷家骕.地理距离对企业社会责任的影响研究[J].管理学报,2022,19(2):254-262.
[25]黄张凯,刘津宇,马光荣.地理位置、高铁与信息:来自中国IPO市场的证据[J].世界经济,2016,39(10):127-149.
[26]SHIN D, HE S, LEE G M, et al. Enhancing social media analysis with visual data analytics:a deep learning approach[J]. MIS quarterly,2020,44(4):1459-1492.
[27]卢盛峰,田慧,李成.财政收入、支出结构激励与民生性公共服务供给[J].经济研究,2025,60(2):141-157.
[28]SUN L, ABRAHAM S. Estimating dynamic treatment effects in event studies with heterogeneous treatment effects[J]. Journal of econometrics,2021,225(2):175-199.
[29]CENGIZ D, DUBE A, LINDNER A, et al. The effect of minimum wages on low-wage jobs[J]. The quarterly journal of economics,2019,134(3):1405-1454.
(1)稳健性检验结果未在正文中列出,留存备索。
基本信息:
DOI:10.19653/j.cnki.dbcjdxxb.2026.01.002
中图分类号:D630;F275;F832.51
引用信息:
[1]卢盛峰,苗润杰,马静.“亲清有为”:政府地理邻近与企业年报可读性[J].东北财经大学学报,2026,No.163(01):15-28.DOI:10.19653/j.cnki.dbcjdxxb.2026.01.002.
基金信息:
国家自然科学基金面上项目“政府地理迁址与财税政策的空间再配置:效应、机制与政策设计”(72073103);国家自然科学基金面上项目“财政管理体制调整与公共服务供给保障:理论、实证与政策优化设计”(72473108); 国家社会科学基金重点项目“基于财政可持续能力提升的财税体制机制优化研究”(25AZD024)
2026-01-15
2026-01-15