nav emailalert searchbtn searchbox tablepage yinyongbenwen piczone journalimg journalInfo journalinfonormal searchdiv searchzone qikanlogo popupnotification paper paperNew
2026, 01, No.163 69-83
收入不平等何以影响社会信任——基于多维公平感的机制分析
基金项目(Foundation): 国家自然科学基金青年项目“教育扩张政策对代际收入流动性的影响:理论机制与经验证据”(72203231)
邮箱(Email):
DOI: 10.19653/j.cnki.dbcjdxxb.2026.01.006
摘要:

降低收入不平等程度、实现全体人民共同富裕,对推进中国式现代化具有重要意义。本文基于2015年、2017年和2019年的中国社会状况综合调查(CSS)数据,从多维公平感的视角,采用有序Probit模型实证检验收入不平等对社会信任的影响及其作用机制。结果表明,收入不平等对社会信任具有负向影响。机制检验发现,提高居民在收入与财富分配、工作与就业机会、社会保障等方面的公平感,均可有效缓解收入不平等对社会信任的负向影响,其中社会保障公平感的作用最突出。值得注意的是,收入不平等对社会信任的负向影响在高学历或家庭收入处于中等及以上水平的群体中更为突出。本文的研究为理解收入不平等如何通过多维公平感影响社会信任提供了理论阐释和经验证据,对厚植社会信任根基、提升治理效能具有重要的政策启示意义。

Abstract:

Reducing income inequality and achieving common prosperity are crucial for strengthening the foundations of social trust and realizing Chinese modernization. During China's social transformation, income inequality remains a pressing issue. Objective income inequality affects people's subjective psychological states, negatively impacting interpersonal trust relationships and hindering the establishment of social trust models based on strangers. This paper investigates the impact of income inequality on social trust based on the 2015, 2017, and 2019 Chinese Social Survey(CSS) data and analyzes its transmission mechanism from the perspective of multidimensional subjective fairness. The empirical study finds that income inequality has a negative effect on social trust levels, and for groups with higher education and income levels, the effect is greater. Multiple dimensions of subjective fairness exhibit simultaneous mechanism effects, among which the social security fairness mechanism plays the strongest role. Among various social security evaluations, employment security evaluation has the most prominent effect on enhancing social trust, as it not only has a significant positive impact on social trust itself but also plays the most central role in the transmission chain of income inequality affecting social trust. Compared with existing literature, the marginal contributions of this paper are mainly reflected in the following four aspects. First, this paper focuses on the impact of China's income inequality on social trust in the new era, which has greater practical value. Second, this paper uses minimum wage income as an instrumental variable, addressing endogenous issues such as measurement errors, missing variables, and reverse causality related to income inequality variables, and effectively identifying the causal relationship between income inequality and social trust. Third, most existing literature on the impact mechanism of income inequality on social trust remains confined to theoretical discussions, while this paper takes subjective fairness as the entry point to deeply explore the influence of subjective fairness in multiple dimensions, such as income, wealth, employment, and social security, analyzing the transmission mechanism through which income inequality affects social trust. Fourth, mechanism analysis indicates that among the subjective fairness in multiple dimensions, the subjective fairness in the social security dimension has a stronger transmission effect. Enhancing subjective fairness in social security can effectively block the negative impact of income inequality on social trust, indicating that residents pay more attention to “bottom-line fairness” than to fairness in other dimensions.This study examines the impact of income inequality on social trust and its underlying mechanisms. Based on key findings, the paper proposes three key measures. First, to mitigate the adverse effects of income inequality on social trust, it is essential to advance reforms in the income distribution system, with a focus on narrowing income disparities. Second, tailored social security and trust-building strategies should be implemented for different groups. Third, significant attention must be paid to enhancing the subjective fairness within the social security system.

参考文献

[1]方亚琴,夏建中.社区治理中的社会资本培育[J].中国社会科学,2019(7):64-84.

[2]胡荣,林兆琦.主观阶层认知、社会资本与城乡居民的社会治理效能感研究[J].中国社会科学院大学学报,2022,42(1):109-125.

[3]COLEMAN J S. Social capital in the creation of human capital[J]. American journal of sociology,1988,94:S95-S120.

[4]ALESINA A, LA FERRARA E. Who trusts others?[J]. Journal of public economics,2002,85(2):207-234.

[5]USLANER E M, BROWN M. Inequality, trust, and civic engagement[J]. American politics research,2005,33(6):868-894.

[6]GUSTAVSSON M, JORDAHL H. Inequality and trust in Sweden:some inequalities are more harmful than others[J]. Journal of public economics,2008,92(1-2):348-365.

[7]DELHEY J, NEWTON K. Who trusts? The origins of social trust in seven societies[J]. European societies,2003,5(2):93-137.

[8]BARONE G, MOCETTI S. Inequality and trust:new evidence from panel data[J]. Economic inquiry,2016,54(2):794-809.

[9]熊猛,叶一舵.相对剥夺感:概念、测量、影响因素及作用[J].心理科学进展,2016,24(3):438-453.

[10]王珏.现代社会信任问题的伦理回应[J].中国社会科学,2018(3):59-65.

[11]翟学伟.信任的本质及其文化[J].社会,2014,34(1):1-26.

[12]李俊青,韩其恒,寇海洁.政府、社会信任与经济增长[J].经济研究,2022,57(6):26-44.

[13]张维迎,柯荣住.信任及其解释:来自中国的跨省调查分析[J].经济研究,2002(10):59-70+96.

[14]GUISO L, SAPIENZA P, ZINGALES L. Trusting the stock market[J]. The journal of finance,2008,63(6):2557-2600.

[15]王正位,王新程.信任与捐赠:社会网络在捐赠型众筹中的认证作用[J].管理世界,2021,37(3):34-50.

[16]杨沫,王岩,连大祥.方言距离、城市规模与流动人口社会信任[J].东北财经大学学报,2023(3):73-85.

[17]李骏,吴晓刚.收入不平等与公平分配:对转型时期中国城镇居民公平观的一项实证分析[J].中国社会科学,2012(3):114-128.

[18]BERND W. Relative deprivation and social mobility:structural constraints on distributive justice judgments[J].European sociological review,1991,7(1):3-18.

[19]赵昕东,赵德金.收入不平等对居民幸福感的影响研究[J].科学决策,2024(3):1-20.

[20]李实,张尉.收入水平、不平等感知与主观福祉[J].北京社会科学,2023(12):106-121.

[21]向德平,李红.个人理性选择、社会制度环境与居民信任度差异[J].重庆社会科学,2014(4):39-52.

[22]NANNESTAD P, SVENDSEN G T, DINESEN P T, et al. Do institutions or culture determine the level of social trust? The natural experiment of migration from non-Western to Western countries[J]. Journal of ethnic and migration studies,2014,40(4):544-565.

[23]ROBINSON R V, BELL W. Equality, success, and social justice in England and the United States[J]. American sociological review,1978,43(2):125-143.

[24]林聚任,张月阳,向维.近十年来居民的社会分化和社会心态变化趋势与问题——基于CGSS有关数据的分析[J].当代世界社会主义问题,2015(3):6-19.

[25]杨灿.中等收入者主观认同感与社会态度研究[J].北京社会科学,2019(4):91-104.

[26]李涛,黄纯纯,何兴强,等.什么影响了居民的社会信任水平?——来自广东省的经验证据[J].经济研究,2008,477(1):137-152.

[27]FREEMAN R B. Low-wage employment:is more or less better?[C]//LUCIFORA C, SALVERDA W. Policies for low-wage employment and social exclusion, Milan:FrancoAngeli,1998:25-46.

[28]叶林祥,GINDLING T H,李实,等.中国企业对最低工资政策的遵守——基于中国六省市企业与员工匹配数据的经验研究[J].经济研究,2015,50(6):19-32.

[29]ROODMAN D. Fitting fully observed recursive mixed-process models with cmp[J]. The stata journal,2011,11(2):159-206.

(1)职业、行业和工作单位性质的分类参见历年的中国社会状况综合调查。

(1)工具变量回归结果未在正文中列出,留存备索。

(1)估计结果未在正文中列出,留存备索。

(1)由于本文后续所有估计均基于工具变量法,故需将其结果与工具变量回归进行对照。在基准回归模型的工具变量回归中,收入不平等对社会信任的影响系数为-1. 150,且在5%水平上显著。

(2)计算方法为(0. 735-1. 150)/1. 150≈-0. 361。

(1)异质性分析结果未在正文中列出,留存备索。

基本信息:

DOI:10.19653/j.cnki.dbcjdxxb.2026.01.006

中图分类号:F124.7

引用信息:

[1]杨沫,陈雨,王晓.收入不平等何以影响社会信任——基于多维公平感的机制分析[J].东北财经大学学报,2026,No.163(01):69-83.DOI:10.19653/j.cnki.dbcjdxxb.2026.01.006.

基金信息:

国家自然科学基金青年项目“教育扩张政策对代际收入流动性的影响:理论机制与经验证据”(72203231)

发布时间:

2026-01-15

出版时间:

2026-01-15

检 索 高级检索